Obamacare appears poised to die
just as it was born: without a single minority party vote. Before Republicans respond
in kind for the uni-partisan action of President Obama’s first term, they should
consider the lesson that Democrats just learned from the 2016 election cycle. Uni-partisanism
sets in motion a political pendulum that eventually comes crashing back.
America’s lurching between partisan policies is
destabilizing. The bitterness
engendered by uni-partisanism is pushing open the traditional borders of the
American political spectrum. Instead of
bounding politics by the ideological left and right limits established by Alexander
Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, fringe
groups are now entering the mainstream
policy debate.
The acceptance of
extremism in mainstream politics is putting at risk the marriage of necessity
between center-left and center-right. Neither side can now afford
to be seen compromising with the other. As the parties become increasingly
estranged, they are undermining their citizens’
faith in the Republic.
The largest loss of faith in government is among Millennials,
who now share
an equal size of the electorate with Baby Boomers. According to Bloomberg, a “quarter
of [Millennials] consider a democratic political system a "bad" or
"very bad" way to run the country.” Left unchecked, these data portend
a coming crisis of governance.
To help restore Millennial confidence in
government, the Baby Boomers must govern inclusively. With the exception of
Generation X Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, the Baby Boomers have absolute
control over policymaking in Washington. Unfortunately, there is yet little
reason to think that the Boomers can or will govern inclusively.
The Baby Boomers may be too close to the problem to respond
effectively. As they said, elections
have consequences. Apparently, those
consequences include ignoring half of American
voters represented by the minority party.
Such attitudes towards governance serve only to shove the pendulum in the
opposite direction. If the unilateral approach to policymaking continues for
much longer, the otherwise centrist-oriented American polity should shudder to
think about what the next few election cycles could bring.
If their parents’ generation is unwilling or unable to
govern inclusively, Millennials should consider entering the arena for the 2018 mid-term
elections. Millennials are not exercising the political power afforded to them
by their numbers. Right now, the
Boomers outnumber them on Capitol Hill by a ratio of 50 to 1. To change the system, they must do more than participate
indirectly.
Unfortunately, Millennials are behind in their political
education. Instead of inheriting a world of limitless opportunity to study at
inexpensive universities, Millennials inherited the
Great Recession and a collapsing
international order. As a result, many
Millennials are struggling with first-order challenges such as finding a job,
paying off student debt, and moving out of their parents’
house.
Despite these systemic disadvantages, Millennials should expect their detractors to continue ridiculing
their entire generation. They will ask how the
“Me
Generation” can be expected to serve to a cause bigger than they even
though Millennials fought America’s
longest wars. Millennials should also expect some good-natured teasing
about participation trophies, to which they should reply that children do
not buy themselves trophies—their parents do.
If Millennials could take one step intellectually to prepare
for their entry into politics, they should pursue a close study of western
civilization. Western civilization is no longer emphasized in the Baby
Boomer-dominated educational
system. Many Americans worship the Founding Fathers in a hollow way, and actually lack understanding of American political philosophy. Instead of those false and idealized view of history, Millennials
should learn about the intellectual lineage that produced their republic. It is a
lineage that can be traced from Jerusalem,
to ancient Athens and Rome, to London, and—finally—to Philadelphia.
As part of their study of western civilization, Millennials should
learn anew something that many
Americans appear to have forgotten. The American experiment in liberty is as
uniquely precious as it is fragile. A few swings of an errant political
pendulum can allow extremism to destabilize the entire system.
Amidst the cacophony of the partisan noise and crashing
pendulums, Millennials must quiet their minds and learn urgently the lessons of
western civilization and American political philosophy. For if events go astray
in the next few election cycles, chances are it will be they organizing the
next Constitutional Convention.
Thought provoking article--thanks for writing it. Some of the basic premises deserve a (respectfully offered) response.
ReplyDeleteFirst, Obamacare is poised to die based on the economics of the thing, not a partisan vote. It is caving in. The response to O-Care's death rattle will be uni-partisan, however. But that's not inappropriate given how it was passed.
Second, regarding fringe entering the mainstream, I think you miss an opportunity to make the point without painting the right with a libel that is, put most kindly, unfair. Put more accurately, it is shameful. Nobody on the right is "mainstreaming" neo-NAZI policies. The fact that one political faction is attempting to normalize that idea about another says more about what that side is willing to do to win. It's despicable.
I'm also convinced that the left-right division is a canard. The real division, highlighted by the popularity of Bernie and Trump, Brexit, the strong social response to police shootings, Occupy Wall Street, and the Tea Party, is between unaccountable elites and the rest of us. They go to Aspen and Davos and Bilderberg to decide how the world should progress, wants of the people be damned.
That creates strong tensions that have simmered and are now coming to a boil. There is a reason Trump was elected. The old, familiar left-right disputes (abortion, rich/poor, taxes, whatever) no longer align with the real social fissures. We must recognize that to properly orient an effective response.
Take note that middle America has no trouble relating to one of the most ostentatiously wealthy men in the country. They don't care that he's rich (they even respect it), they care that he is on their side and perceived to be bringing accountability where none has previously existed. Will he actually do it? Who knows. But they think he will and that made him president.
So it's possible that the article's very premises (and its construction--the links and examples are rather one-sided) are evidence of the very thing it decries.
But the call for a true understanding of Western civilization is so important. Not the cartoon version of it that we too frequently accept as sufficient, but as you described--rich and detailed (and accurate).
Thanks again for writing the article--you intended to be thought provoking and you succeeded.